Overview
A high‑volume fabric style became the top contributor to department scrap, driven by weight, shade, and width variation. Using a full DMAIC approach, I integrated multi‑system data, validated the measurement system, identified statistically significant contributors, and executed a 7‑factor DOE to stabilize the process and reduce scrap.
Problem
This style generated significant annual scrap losses, driven by:
High variation in weight
Off‑spec shade and width
Frequent redries
Inconsistent machine settings
No standardized recipe
Baseline capability was poor (CpK = 0.135), and operators lacked a reliable recipe to consistently meet specifications.
Aproach
I consolidated data from SAP, MES, Trend, and Lab systems into a unified dataset.
Key steps:
Stratified by material, speed, redry status, and production order
Identified top defect categories
Established 2022 as baseline
Conducted capability analysis (CpK < 1.33 → not capable)
Performed a Gauge R&R to validate the weight measurement process.
%GRR = 26%
5 distinct categories
Measurement system acceptable for improvement work
Using regression and ANOVA, I identified two contributors with statistically significant impact on weight:
Speed
Jet/Redry condition
Both null hypotheses were rejected.
Performed an Impact vs. Effort analysis, which identified a DOE as the best path forward. Then executed a 7‑factor, 2‑level DOE to optimize:
Speed
Rail width
Pad pressure
Oven temperature
Water temperature
Fans
Overfeed
Created 16 experimental recipes and evaluated weight and width performance.
DOE Result:
R² = 94%
Identified optimal combination of speed, pad pressure, oven temperature, and rail width
Developed three progressively improved recipes that led to reduce the weight variation of the critical style.
Evaluated high‑risk failure modes and implemented corrective actions:
Beta gauge calibration routines
Load cell checks
Recipe standardization
Redry/rework recipe creation
Incoming fabric evaluation
Operator documentation & SOP updates
Results
37% reduction from 2022 → 2023
28% reduction from 2022 → 2024
Delivered more than $35K in verified annual savings
Achieved despite lower throughput in both years
Significant reduction in weight variation
DOE success rate progression:
37.5% → 61.1% → 94.6% success rate
Standardized recipes for production and rework
Calibration and inspection routines implemented
Documentation created for replication
Handoff completed to new Process Engineer
Key Skills Demonstrated
DMAIC Methodologies
DOE design & execution
Regression & ANOVA
MSA (Gauge R&R)
Root cause analysis
FMEA
Multi‑system data integration
Recipe optimization
Cross‑functional leadership
Lean Six Sigma methodology